GMAT申友句子改错SC题库-The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the-破解版07-真题答案解析

题库解析 > 修饰语题型 >

本题由lindy提供

The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet

domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

(B) the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell

(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell

(E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

登录申友雷哥GMAT，查看答案及解析

视频解析

暂无视频解析，点击获取更多视频内容

文字解析

答案：

考点: 逻辑�

��达(Logical Predication) 　　1) 动名词结构含有正在进行的意思,多表示动作的过程　　2) 修饰语应该尽可能靠近修饰对象,否则很容易引起修饰不清　　3) of + doing修饰名词而to do结构修饰动词,表示目的　　(A) 从逻辑意思上看The proliferation…导致的结果是反域名强占保护法案的通过,而不是通过的过程,因此passing应该改为 passage,强调结果.in 1999既可能修饰Act也可能修饰passing,导致修饰不清;分词结构allowing…修饰有歧义。　　(B) in 1999位置不对,导致修饰不清;with the sole intent that they will sell表达复杂,笨拙. 　　(C) 正确, lead to the passage强调了结果;which非限定定语从句修饰Act,意思表达清楚;时间状语in 1999紧靠修饰对象the passage,修饰无歧意;用of selling修饰名词intent表达正确　　(D) 从逻辑意思上看,The proliferation…导致的结果是法案的通过,而不是导致了法案,因此lead to the Anti- Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999意思表达不完整;with the sole intent to sell错误,应该改为with the sole intent of selling. 　　(E) 错误同D,逻辑意思表达不完整　　句子结构: The proliferation… led to the passage…of…Act, which allows companies to… 　　补充说明:要注意不要将with the sole intent to sell误认为是to do结构表示目的. to do结构修饰的是动词,如果修饰名词的话应该用A of B结构.with the sole intent没有动词出现,所以应该用of selling来修饰名词 intent